53º Partly Cloudy


  • Front Page
  • Happening
  • Media
  • Crime
  • Sports
  • Going Out
  • Politics
  • Send a Tip
  • About

rankings

Media

St. Louis Ranks #1 in Something, It’s Best We Don’t Get into Specifics


Posted by The Editor on 01 Jun 2010 /
Tweet



Begin press release:

To: Everyone

Re: St. Louis ranking #1 in something

According to a recent study by Punching Kitty.com, St. Louis has come out on top, over all the major US metro areas, as the best city for…um…this crazy thing…it’s not really important.

“After pouring through all the data we have concluded that St. Louis finally has a study to hang it’s hat on as it came in the clear number 1 beating out San Francisco, CA, New York City, NY and Bald Knob, AR” said editor Mike Flynn. The list of factors that went in to the decision included:

- Number of times you get asked for money during the day (bonus points if its the same person multiple times.)

- Percentage of unused parks.

- Overall coverage of kids that are maybe eleven but still totally intimidate you when walking past them in the street.

- Chances of actually getting the cab you called and reserved.

- Ratio of actual and ironic mullets in the metro area.

- Number of BBQ places that people review as “It’s ok.”

- The dart test.

- Overall count of women in clubs that look ok until the light glints off that snaggletooth and then you go “Eh.” and hook up anyway.

Those are just a small sample of the thing taken in to account and actually, there were tons of factors that went in to this decision, but in the end St. Louis came out on top. Other notables in the list of 100 were Portland, OR coming in at 7, Las Vegas, NV sliding in at 11, Boise, ID at 34, Kansas City at 76 and Chicago at 99.

Dead last went to Detroit, MI as is required by the recently passed “All Lists Must End with Detroit, MI” law that went in to effect after Detroit collectively crapped itself and then rolled over and slept in it back in 2008.


Happening

Another Study Says it Sucks to Live in St. Louis


Posted by The Editor on 01 Jun 2010 /
Tweet



So yet another study says it sucks to live in St. Louis. Out of 67 cities, St. Louis came in 40th under the vague ”Quality of Life” category.

The study compared the performances of America’s 67 biggest metropolitan areas in 20 statistical categories. The highest scores went to well-rounded markets with healthy economies, moderate costs of living, light traffic, impressive housing stocks and high-powered educational systems. [...]

The St. Louis area’s lowest rankings, each at No. 57 in their categories, came for its percentage of workers who walk to work or work from home at 5.1 percent; and self-employment, at 8.4 percent.

The city ranked 56th for its percentage of younger adults, ages 25-44, at 26.5 percent.

Ok, we get it. Hello! Everyone that does these little click-bait “studies”!? We get it! We’re cool. We know things aren’t always great here in St. Louis, but we really don’t need you asking four of your friends to order the cities they’ve been to in order of “awesomeness” and then post that to your site but just change “awesomeness” to something that sounds better like “Quality of Life” or “Happiness Quotient”.

Look at those shit reasons we got marked down in this one above. We got killed on the fact that not many of us work from home or walk to work?! What the hell is that? Maybe people like to drive to work. Maybe its the one time in the day they get peace and quiet and maybe that makes their lives a little better. Maybe they sit in that car every morning and night and think…

“Ah. Its nice to sit here and listen to horrible talk radio for 40 minutes before I get home and have to start pretending to like my kid. Did you know he plays badminton at school? Who the hell plays badminton…and what school would waste money on that? Probably going to have meatloaf tonight again…ugh! Be cool. Don’t waste this time in the car. Focus on your true love: pretending to be an asian school girl on Second Life.”

See that guy enjoys his time in the car!

It can’t be more clear at this point that you can twist one of these bullshit lists to in any direction you want and it’s high time St. Louis twists a study or two in our direction!

To be continued!

via St. Louis Business Journal


Sports

ESPN Says the Rams Are the Worst Value In All of Sports


Posted by The Editor on 02 Jul 2009 /
Tweet



sad_ram_fam

In the most recent issue of ESPN The Magazine (July 13, 2009) they released their annual Ultimate Standings where they grade all NBA, NFL and MLB teams in things like “Stadium Experience,” “Fan Relations,” and “Ownership.”

In the “Bang for the Buck” category, which is “wins over the past year per revenues directly from fans, adjusted for league schedules”, the Rams came in dead last, as in 122 out of 122.  Well done guys.

Other notable St. Louis team appearances are the Blues coming in #3 the “Swag” category (for their “free food” nights) and the Cardinals tied for #1 in the “Title Track” category along with the Los Angeles Angels and the D-Town Red Wings, which measures “Championships already won or expected within the lifetime of current fans”

The overall rankings have the Blues at #10, Cardinals at #26 and the Rams at #112.


0

subscribers

1,396

followers




Note: This website, and the content within, may not necessarily be the views of the author's employers, friends or family.

Copyright © 2012